|
|
|
|
Roadless Rule a Win For Westerners |
By Jim Sims, Special to the News
May 23, 2005
The new "Roadless Rule" recently unveiled by federal officials
in Washington, D.C., isn't like most federal regulations that
get branded on the West's hindquarters by the federal
bureaucrats out East.
This one actually assumes that Westerners are smart enough to
play a role in managing our lands.
In short, President Bush's new Roadless Rule is a big victory
for the American West, for the philosophy of multiple use of
federal lands, and for all those who support a common-sense
balance between conservation and economic growth.
Unfortunately, the Rocky Mountain News completely missed the
point of this new regulation in its recent coverage ("Roadless
lands opened," May 6).
Instead of empowering unelected bureaucrats in Washington, the
president's new Roadless Rule empowers citizens at the state and
local level to help determine which national forest lands should
be preserved as "roadless areas." Instead of top-down
management, it promotes grass-roots involvement. Instead of land
use deals made behind closed doors with special interests, it
gives citizens a real seat at the decision-making table:
• Governors have 18 months to petition the U.S. Department of
Agriculture with state-specific plans identifying proposed
roadless areas in their state.
• Petitions may include ways to protect public health and
safety, reduce wildfire risks to communities and critical
wildlife habitat, maintain critical infrastructure (such as dams
and utilities), and ensure that citizens have access to private
property.
• If the USDA accepts a petition, the U.S. Forest Service will
work with the state to develop a state-specific rule.
• The process will include any required National Environmental
Policy Act analysis and will invite further public input during
a notice-and-comment period.
• If a state chooses not to file a petition, inventoried
roadless areas within that state will continue to be managed in
accordance with each national forest's land and resource
management plan.
Just as important as what the Roadless Rule does is what it does
not do:
• Unlike the previous rule, which was stuck down by the federal
courts, this rule does not violate federal law by creating de
facto wilderness outside the congressional approval process laid
out in the federal Wilderness Act.
• It does not allow unelected bureaucrats in Washington to
dictate to the West which lands make sense for roadless
designation without state and local input.
• It does not "roll back" protections for roadless areas. There
was no "Roadless Rule" in place when the new rule was announced
on May 5. The previous rule, developed by the Clinton
administration, had been struck down by the courts. The new USDA
rule puts roadless area protections in place where none existed.
The previous rule was deeply flawed in several ways.
For one, a significant portion of the land designated by
Clinton's political appointees wasn't roadless at all.
In other cases, the targeted lands had important economic
mineral reserves. Incredibly, the old rule proposed surrounding
more than 1 million acres of private lands with roadless areas,
cutting off access to those private lands.
In short, the old rule allowed Washington to dictate these
decisions to states and localities. Special-interest groups
loved that approach because it gave them a dull blade to carve
up new wilderness areas without having to get congressional
approval and without meaningful local input.
In sharp contrast, the Bush administration's rule goes the other
way. It doesn't restrict how many acres can be designated as
roadless. It just says that Washington can't unilaterally force
such a momentous decision down our throats here in the West.
Here is another reason this model works well: Local input
increases the likelihood that the public will accept the final
product. Collaboration at the front end often means less
confrontation at the back end.
This new Roadless Rule isn't perfect. Washington still retains
much of the final say on roadless area designations. But for
Colorado and the West, with our huge stretches of federal lands,
this new rule will help us more successfully balance
environmental values with policies that encourage greater
economic prosperity for all.
Jim Sims is executive director of the Western Business
Roundtable, a nonprofit business trade association. He also
served as director of communications for President George W.
Bush's energy policy task force.
See original article
Rocky Mountain News: Opinion Roadless Rule
|
|