|
|
|
|
A Professional Forester's Point of View |
By District Ranger Dave Freeland, Sequoia National Forest
The public may not be aware that their public
forests are in a generally
unnatural condition due to the exclusion of fire playing its
natural role
within the ecosystem for the last hundred years. This situation
has
created overcrowding of trees, along with other associated
vegetation.
Forest Ecologists have determined that in pre-settlement times,
a range of
40 to 70 conifer trees per acre existed in the western
landscape. Low intensity fires, burning on a regular basis, thinned the forest.
In
comparison, forested areas today contain as much as 400 to 500
trees per
acre. Over crowded forests create an environment where
individual trees
have difficulty competing for limited sunlight, soil moisture
and
nutrients. As a result, trees become stressed and are more
susceptible to
premature mortality from extended periods of drought and from
attack by
insects and other forest pathogens.
Another unwanted condition from fire exclusion is that more
shade tolerant
trees become established on each acre due to tree density. White
fir and
incense cedar are two shade tolerant tree species common in our
area. In
contrast, Ponderosa and Jeffrey pine are less tolerant to shade
as they
grow. The foliage of young fir and cedars extend close to the
forest
floor, which creates a ³fuel ladder² where fire can quickly
climb low
hanging limbs and become established in the upper reaches of the
tree
canopy. What should have been a low intensity ground fire
becomes a crown
fire potentially leading to a stand (forest) replacing event.
A more dramatic consequence from unnatural forests is the
abnormal number
of catastrophic fires that have occurred over the past 30 years.
Excessive
tree density, in combination with abundance of dead and down
vegetation and
old, decadent brush fields, has created a formula for disaster.
Catastrophic fires have adversely affected millions of acres
over the last
several decades well beyond what occurred historically. As a
recent member
of a national incident management response team, I personally
witnessed
extreme fire behavior all over the country that took human life,
personal
property and destroyed ecosystems that will not be fully recover
for
several life times even under ideal conditions. The Manter
(2000) and
McNally (2002) are recent examples of unusually large and
devastating
fires. The McNally was the largest recorded fire to occur on the
Sequoia
National Forest.
What is the solution? Professional land managers, with the
assistance of
researchers, continually identify areas of concern, assess
ecosystem
function and health, and implement a number of management
strategies. One
common practice is to mechanically thin selected forested areas
to reduce
the number of trees to within acceptable limits. Other
management actions
within the Foresterıs tool bag include, but are not limited to,
introducing
fire back into the ecosystem where appropriate to reduce density
of trees
and brush, promote regeneration and establish younger age
classes of
vegetation mixed with the older age classes. Less catastrophic
fires,
endemic, rather than epidemic insect and disease intrusions,
more succulent
food sources for a variety of wildlife species and improved
cattle grazing
are positive outcomes.
There are currently two acceptable methods of introducing fire
back into
the ecosystem. One method is prescribed burning, which is the
intentional
ignition of fires within selected areas, by highly skilled fire
professionals. Prescribed burning can only be initiated when air
temperature, humidity, fuel moisture, wind speed and direction,
optimum
smoke lofting, etc. are within acceptable limits. A more recent
technique
being used on public lands is wildland fire use. When a
naturally caused
fire starts by lightning, wildland fire use can be approved
within
predetermined areas, such as wilderness areas located on the
Kern Plateau.
In 2003, approximately 5000 acres were treated within the South
Sierra
Wilderness through wildland fire use. Additional acres were
treated in
2004. The U.S. Forest Service intends to expand wildland fire
use as a
viable tool to allow fire to play a more natural role in the
ecosystem for a variety of resource and social benefits.
Through continued and appropriate mechanical thinning,
prescribed burning
and wildland fire use, land management professionals have
renewed hope to
transition valuable public lands back into an acceptable natural
and
healthy condition, more resilient to unwanted catastrophic
events. Though
this multi-agency effort will take many decades to make a
noticeable
difference, wonıt it be worth the effort?
Dave Freeland
District Ranger
Cannell Meadow/Greenhorn Ranger Districts
Sequoia National Forest
Link to this article reprinted in
Eco-Logic Powerhouse
A professional forester's point of view in
Eco-Logic Powerhouse
Other related articles
Benefits of Forest Thinning-Journal of
Forestry January/February 2006
Today's Choices Tomorrows Forests-Professor Piirto March 2006
Funding Environmental
Initiatives-Testimony
Death of a Sawmill
|
|